A Brief Guide for Accountants
IFRS 18 brings significant changes to the Statement of Profit or Loss, including new categories and required subtotals.
But what happens to the other primary financial statements?
Once the cash flow is set, as described in part 1, we need to highlight the changes in the financial statements.
For the Statement of Financial Position (Balance Sheet) and the Statement of Changes in Equity, the answer is different: There is no fundamental redesign of either statement.
The familiar structures remain, but IFRS 18 introduces a broader presentation framework that accountants must consider when determining how information is grouped, presented and connected across the financial statements.
The accountant’s challenge is therefore less about rebuilding these statements and more about ensuring that they remain properly classified, appropriately aggregated or disaggregated, and consistent with the rest of the IFRS 18 financial statements.
| IAS 1 | IFRS 18 |
| Statement of Financial Position presented assets, liabilities and equity. | Same fundamental structure. |
| Current and non-current classifications applied, subject to applicable requirements. | The classification framework is substantially retained. |
| Statement of Changes in Equity reconciled movements in each component of equity. | Same fundamental reconciliation continues. |
| Profit or loss and OCI flowed into equity. | Same fundamental relationship continues. |
| IAS 1 contained the primary presentation requirements. | IFRS 18 becomes the principal presentation and disclosure Standard replacing IAS 1. |
| Aggregation and disaggregation principles applied. | IFRS 18 provides enhanced aggregation and disaggregation principles. |
Structure → Largely retained
Recognition and measurement → Not fundamentally changed by IFRS 18
Presentation discipline → Enhanced
Cross-statement consistency → Increasingly important
The Balance Sheet remains centered on three fundamental elements:
The familiar presentation continues to include items such as:
Assets
Liabilities
Equity
IFRS 18 does not introduce a new measurement basis for these balances simply because it replaces IAS 1.
| IAS 1 | IFRS 18 |
| Current Assets | Current Assets |
| Cash | Cash |
| Trade Receivables | Trade Receivables |
| Inventories | Inventories |
| Non-Current Assets | Non-Current Assets |
| PPE | PPE |
| Intangible Assets | Intangible Assets |
| Current Liabilities | Current Liabilities |
| Trade Payables | Trade Payables |
| Short-Term Borrowings | Short-Term Borrowings |
| Non-Current Liabilities | Non-Current Liabilities |
| Long-Term Borrowings | Long-Term Borrowings |
| Equity | Equity |
| Share Capital & Reserves | Share Capital & Reserves |
Not the basic structure. The accountant should instead focus on whether the presentation provides an appropriate structured summary of the entity’s assets, liabilities and equity.
IFRS 18’s aggregation and disaggregation principles do not apply only to the P&L. They are relevant across the financial statements.
Consider:
Other Current Assets — $12 million
The balance contains:
Prepayments — $3m
Staff advances — $1m
Tax receivable — $6m
Other receivables — $2m
The accountant should ask:
Do these items share sufficiently similar characteristics to remain aggregated?
Does the $12 million caption obscure material information?
Depending on the facts and materiality, additional disaggregation may be appropriate in the primary statement or notes.
| Potentially Over-Aggregated | More Informative Where Material |
| Other Current Assets — $12m | Prepayments — $3m |
| Tax Receivable — $6m | |
| Other Receivables & Advances — $3m |
This does not mean IFRS 18 requires every balance to appear separately on the face of the Balance Sheet. The objective is to find the appropriate balance between useful aggregation and sufficient disaggregation without obscuring material information.
Accountants should continue applying the applicable current/non-current classification requirements.
IFRS 18 does not mean that existing balances should automatically move between current and non-current categories.
For example:
| Transaction | Classification |
| Trade receivable expected to be realized in the normal operating cycle | Current |
| Inventory held for sale in the normal operating cycle | Current |
| Long-term property used in operations | Non-current |
| Borrowing | Classification depends on the applicable IFRS requirements and facts |
The important accountant point is:
Do not treat IFRS 18 implementation as an automatic balance-sheet reclassification exercise.
Review classifications, but change them only where the applicable IFRS requirements and facts support the change.
Again, there is no fundamental redesign.
The Statement of Changes in Equity continues to explain movements between:
The objective remains to allow users to understand how each component of equity changed during the reporting period.
| IAS 1 — BEFORE | IFRS 18 — NOW |
| Opening balance | Opening balance |
| Profit for the year | Profit for the year |
| OCI movements | OCI movements |
| Dividends | Dividends |
| Share issues / capital movements | Share issues / capital movements |
| Transfers between reserves | Transfers between reserves |
| Other equity movements | Other equity movements |
| Closing balance | Closing balance |
No major change. But IFRS 18 implementation increases the importance of ensuring that the equity statement remains consistent with the revised presentation elsewhere in the financial statements.
Suppose an entity reports:
Opening retained earnings: $20m
Profit for the year: $5m
Dividends: ($2m)
IFRS 18 |
IFRS 18 |
| Opening retained earnings — $20m | Opening retained earnings — $20m |
| · Profit — $5m – Dividends — $2m |
· Profit — $5m – Dividends — $2m |
| Closing retained earnings — $23m | Closing retained earnings — $23m |
Nothing in the basic equity roll-forward. IFRS 18 may change how components of financial performance are presented in the P&L, but that does not create a new retained-earnings mechanism.
The Statement of Changes in Equity also continues to capture movements arising through Other Comprehensive Income (OCI).
Depending on the applicable IFRS requirements, these may include items such as:
The underlying recognition of these items continues to depend on the relevant IFRS Accounting Standard. IFRS 18 primarily addresses their presentation.
Assume:
Opening revaluation reserve: $4m
OCI revaluation increase: $1m
IAS 1 |
IFRS 18 |
| Opening reserve — $4m | Opening reserve — $4m |
| · OCI movement — $1m | · OCI movement — $1m |
| Closing reserve — $5m | Closing reserve — $5m |
No fundamental change. The accountant must still ensure that OCI Statement; Statement of Changes in Equity; Closing Balance Sheet Reserve all reconcile.
The Balance Sheet and Statement of Changes in Equity may not change dramatically, but they cannot be reviewed in isolation.
Accountants should think of the financial statements as a connected reporting system:
The introduction of IFRS 18 therefore creates an important implementation requirement:
Changes to one statement must not create inconsistencies elsewhere.
Review:
Review:
Assume the current reporting package contains:
Under IFRS 18, do not update only the P&L mapping.
The implementation process should be:
This avoids an IFRS 18 implementation in which the P&L is updated but the remainder of the financial statements still reflects an outdated reporting architecture.
Before IFRS 18 implementation:
For the Balance Sheet and Statement of Changes in Equity, IFRS 18 is not about rebuilding the accounting from the ground up.
The fundamental structures remain familiar.
Same fundamental structure → Greater presentation discipline
Same fundamental reconciliation → Stronger cross-statement consistency
Classification + Aggregation/Disaggregation + Reconciliation + Consistency
The practical question is therefore not:
“How do we redesign the Balance Sheet and Equity Statement?”
It is:
“Do these statements remain properly structured, sufficiently informative and fully connected to the new IFRS 18 presentation framework?”
For accountants, successful IFRS 18 implementation means looking beyond the P&L and ensuring that the entire set of financial statements tells one consistent financial story.